Marketing models: from the 4Ps to customer-centred models, and which fits your industry
Each marketing model is a checklist for choices; pick the one that matches how your customers buy.
In this topic: Marketing 12
A model is a checklist for choices, not a strategy
From McCarthy's 4Ps to the 7Ps for services and Lauterborn's 4Cs: what each marketing model asks, where it falls short and which one suits your industry.
Marketing models are shorthand. The 4Ps, the 7Ps and the 4Cs each give you a short list of decisions to check, so you do not forget one while you concentrate on another. None of them tells you what to decide. Below you will find where the best-known marketing models come from, what each adds, where each falls short and which fits which kind of business.
A payroll bureau serves as the running example. Amounts are in euros; the logic works in any currency.
What a marketing model does, and what it does not
Marketing is more than selling. Strong businesses line up what they offer, what they charge, where they sell and how they keep in touch, so that every element tells the same story. A model helps you see whether that is the case. Its value lies in the connections: a price rise without better service or clearer communication invites customers to leave. What a model cannot do is replace research. It tells you which questions to ask, not what your customers will answer.
Where the marketing mix comes from
Neil Borden of Harvard Business School popularised the term marketing mix. He liked James Culliton's description of the marketing executive as a "mixer of ingredients" and listed twelve ingredients for manufacturers, from product planning, pricing and branding to packaging, display, servicing, physical handling and fact finding. E. Jerome McCarthy condensed the list into four headings in his textbook Basic Marketing (1960): product, price, place and promotion. The short version stuck, helped by being easy to remember; Borden's long list is still a useful check for manufacturers.
The 4Ps of marketing (McCarthy)
| P | Guiding question | Common pitfall |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Which customer problem does it solve better than the alternatives? | Adding features nobody asked for |
| Price | What is it worth to the customer, and does the price signal that? | Cost plus a margin, without checking value |
| Place | Can customers buy it where and when they need it? | Too many channels with too little attention for each |
| Promotion | How do customers hear about it and remember it? | Broadcasting without listening |
Review the mix every quarter. A higher price needs a visible reason in the product or the communication; a new channel may need a different price or package.
The 4Ps are written from the seller's side and were designed with physical products in mind. Two later models address exactly those limits.
The 7Ps for services (Booms and Bitner)
In 1981 Bernard Booms and Mary Jo Bitner proposed three extra elements for service firms, in a chapter of the American Marketing Association's Marketing of Services. A service cannot be inspected before it is bought, so customers judge it by the people who deliver it, the way it is delivered and the tangible clues around it.
Ruth Brandt runs Brandt Payroll, which handles payroll for small employers such as restaurants, shops and practices. Her mix:
| Element | What it covers | Brandt Payroll |
|---|---|---|
| Product | The service and its scope | Monthly payroll, payslips, statutory filings, quick answers to employer questions |
| Price | Fee level and structure | A fixed monthly fee per employee instead of hourly billing |
| Place | Access | Online portal and phone; visits on request |
| Promotion | How clients find her | Referrals from accountants and clients; articles answering employers' questions |
| People | Everyone the client deals with | One named specialist per client, replies within a working day |
| Process | How the service runs | Hours submitted by a fixed date, checks before every run, a deadline calendar |
| Physical evidence | Tangible proof of quality | Clear payslips, a monthly summary for the employer, a tidy portal |
The 4Cs (Lauterborn): the customer's view of the mix
In 1990 Robert Lauterborn, professor of advertising at the University of North Carolina, argued in Advertising Age that the 4Ps had had their day, and proposed four Cs seen from the buyer's side.
| 4Ps | 4Cs | What changes in practice |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Consumer wants and needs | Start from the problem, not from what you make |
| Price | Cost to satisfy | Count everything the customer gives up: money, time, effort, the risk of switching |
| Place | Convenience to buy | Make access easy at the moment the customer wants it |
| Promotion | Communication | A conversation instead of a broadcast: questions, replies, reviews |
The cost to the customer is where the 4Cs earn their keep. One of Ruth's clients is a restaurant with 12 staff. The owner spends about five hours a month collecting paper timesheets and answering queries. Ruth offers a timesheet app at a higher fee, which cuts that time to about one and a half hours. The owner values an hour at €40, what that time could earn in the restaurant.
| Per year | Today | With timesheet app |
|---|---|---|
| Fee (12 staff x 12 months) | €18 per employee: €2,592 | €21 per employee: €3,024 |
| Owner's time | 60 hours x €40 = €2,400 | 18 hours x €40 = €720 |
| Total cost to the client | €4,992 | €3,744 |
| Brandt's staff time per month | 4 hours | 2.5 hours |
| Revenue per staff hour, after app costs of €24 a month | €216 / 4 = €54 | (€252 - €24) / 2.5 = €91.20 |
Fictitious Firmfocus example. All names and figures are invented to show the method.
The fee rises by €432 a year, yet the client's total cost falls by €1,248. Seen through the 4Ps, Ruth is raising her price; seen through the 4Cs, she is lowering the cost to satisfy. Her communication should say "about €1,250 a year less in fees and your own time", not "new app, new fee".
Other marketing models worth knowing
SOSTAC
PR Smith's planning sequence: situation, objectives, strategy, tactics, actions and control. It orders the work rather than the mix; see marketing step by step.
Mental and physical availability
Byron Sharp and the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute argue that brands grow mainly by winning more buyers: being easy to think of when buying, and easy to buy.
Borden's twelve ingredients
The original long list. Useful for manufacturers that need to check packaging, display, servicing and physical handling separately.
Which marketing model fits your industry?
| Industry | Model that helps most | Elements that weigh most |
|---|---|---|
| Shops and online stores | 4Ps, checked with the 4Cs | Price, range, convenience of buying and delivery, online visibility |
| Restaurants, hotels, salons | 7Ps | People, process and the look and feel of the place |
| Professional and business services | 7Ps, with the 4Cs for the client's total cost | People, reputation and referrals more than price |
| Care and wellbeing | 7Ps | Trust, access, clear and patient communication |
| Manufacturing and wholesale | 4Ps, or Borden's longer list | Product, distribution, personal selling, after-sales service |
| Subscriptions and software | 4Cs | Total cost over time, ease of use, ongoing communication |
Many businesses straddle two rows. A café that sells coffee beans online needs the 7Ps for the café and the 4Ps for the webshop. Industry guides such as start a restaurant or café, start an online store and start a consultancy show what matters in each.
Three things that matter more than the model
- Needs before offer: find out what customers struggle with before you design the product, as in value proposition and jobs to be done.
- One story across all elements: price, channel, service and message must support the same promise.
- Reputation as an investment: reviews, referrals and repeat business build slowly and are lost quickly.
Marketing is often the first cost cut in a downturn. The Ehrenberg-Bass Institute tracked Australian consumer goods brands that stopped all mass-media advertising for a year or more: on average they lost sales, the loss grew the longer the pause lasted, and bigger brands tended to hold up better. Small brands have the least to fall back on, so scale back to your best channels rather than going silent.
Marketing models in a small business and a larger organisation
Small business
Pick one model and use it as a quarterly checklist: the 4Ps for products, the 7Ps for services, then run the 4Cs over your price to see the full cost to the customer. One page is enough.
Larger organisation
Use one shared model across teams so product, pricing, sales and service speak the same language. Apply it per segment or product line: the right mix for one group can be wrong for another.
Marketing model pitfalls
- Filling in boxes: a completed table is not a choice; each line should say what you do differently.
- Treating elements separately: the value lies in how they fit together.
- Ignoring the customer's other costs: time, effort and risk count as much as your price.
- Forcing a product model onto a service: without people and process you miss what clients judge you on.
- Swapping models every year: keep one long enough to compare quarters.
To apply the mix on a small budget, read marketing for small businesses; to put it into a plan with objectives and KPIs, see strategic marketing plan. All marketing topics are in Marketing, and the guides for new businesses in Start a business.
What is the difference between the 4Ps and the 4Cs?
Which marketing model is best for a small business?
How do I know whether my marketing mix fits my industry?
Sources
- Neil H. Borden: The Concept of the Marketing Mix, Journal of Advertising Research, Classics Volume II (September 1984)
- E. Jerome McCarthy: Basic Marketing, A Managerial Approach, Irwin (library record, University of Marburg) (1960)
- Catalin Gradinaru, Sorin-George Toma and Paul Marinescu: Marketing Mix in Services, Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series (on Booms and Bitner) (2016)
- Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science: How do you measure How Brands Grow? (October 2026)
- Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science: the negative effect an advertising hiatus has on brand growth (October 2026)
- Chartered Institute of Marketing, PR Smith: SOSTAC plans in the AI age (September 2025)
Maak gebruik van onze ondernemerstools en de laatste branche-informatie
Verkrijg direct toegang tot alle stappen, downloads en tools voor ondernemers.
- Toegang tot de meest actuele bedrijfstakcijfers
- Ondernemingsplan online tool — schrijf en download naar MS Word
- Download tools en templates voor ondernemers
- Vergelijk en bewaar uw eigen cijfers met het branchegemiddelde