OGSM model: your strategy on one page, from ambition to action
One page that says where you are going, how you will know and what you will do.
In this topic: Execution and control 7
Forty pages get read once. One page gets used every month.
The OGSM model puts your strategy on a single page: an objective, measurable goals, a few strategic choices and the measures and actions behind them.
What is the OGSM model?
The OGSM model is a one-page format for a strategy. OGSM stands for Objective, Goals, Strategies and Measures. On one sheet you write where you want to be in a few years, how you will know you got there, which choices take you there and how you track and carry out each choice. The page then becomes the agenda for every progress meeting.
The value lies in the limit. A long document can hold every wish; a single page cannot. You pick three to five goals and three to five strategies, and show how each action connects to them.
The origin of OGSM is not well documented. It is often linked to post-war Japanese management practice, where goals were deployed through every level of a company (policy deployment, or hoshin kanri), and to its use at Procter & Gamble. These accounts are hard to verify. What matters is what the format makes you do.
The four parts of an OGSM
| Part | Question it answers | Form | Typical mistake |
|---|---|---|---|
| O: Objective | Where do we want to be in three to five years, and for whom? | One concrete sentence in words, without a revenue figure | A slogan any company could sign, such as "the preferred partner of our customers" |
| G: Goals | How will we know we got there? | Three to five measurable goals, each with a start value, an end value and a date | Activities instead of results, such as "launch a portal" |
| S: Strategies | Which choices get us there? | Three to five choices of a few words each; deciding to stop something counts too | Goals repeated in other words, such as "grow revenue" |
| M: Measures | How do we track and carry out each strategy? | Per strategy, a few dashboard measures plus actions with an owner and a date | Only lagging measures, or actions nobody owns |
The logic runs upwards: every action serves a strategy, every strategy serves a goal, and the goals together prove the objective.
How to make an OGSM in six steps
- 01
Start from a choice you have already made
An OGSM records a strategy; it does not create one. If the options are still open, first evaluate and choose.
- 02
Write the objective
One sentence: for whom you want to be what, and why they would choose you. Test it by asking whether a competitor could sign the same sentence.
- 03
Make the goals measurable and test them
Give each goal a start value, an end value and a date. Check margin targets against your industry with benchmarking and check that the financial plan can carry them.
- 04
Choose the strategies
Three to five choices, each contributing to at least one goal. Include at least one thing you will stop doing, so the new work has room.
- 05
Link measures and actions
Per strategy, two or three measures, at least one of them leading, and the actions with an owner, a date and a budget.
- 06
Test, cascade and set the rhythm
Check the page against the budget, let departments write their own, and review measures and actions quarterly, objective and strategies yearly.
How to write SMART goals for your OGSM
| Vague | SMART |
|---|---|
| Grow in the food sector | Contract revenue from food producers rises from €2.25 million to €6.6 million by year five |
| Deliver results faster | From year two, 95% of results are delivered within the agreed turnaround time, measured monthly |
| Become more profitable | Operating margin rises from 7% to 11% within five years |
Fictitious Firmfocus example, taken from the worked OGSM below.
The SMART test goes back to George Doran, who proposed that objectives be specific, measurable, assignable, realistic and time-related (Management Review, 1981). Most versions now read "achievable" and "relevant" for two of the letters. Use SMART as a test, not a template: a goal can pass every letter and still be the wrong goal.
Why goals work, and when they backfire
Edwin Locke and Gary Latham summarised decades of research: specific, difficult goals consistently led to higher performance than urging people to do their best, and the effect was strongest when people were committed and received feedback on their progress (American Psychologist, 2002). In OGSM terms, the goals row works only together with the measures row, because the measures provide that feedback.
Goals also have side effects. Lisa Ordóñez and colleagues warned that goal setting can be overprescribed, with a narrow focus that neglects everything outside the goal, distorted risk-taking, a rise in unethical behaviour, inhibited learning and damage to culture and motivation (Academy of Management Perspectives, 2009). Keep goals few, pair a growth goal with a margin or quality goal, and avoid large bonuses tied to one number.
Richard Rumelt adds a strategic warning: mistaking goals for strategy is one of the hallmarks of bad strategy (McKinsey Quarterly, 2011). The strategies column must contain choices about how you will win, not more targets.
OGSM example: a testing laboratory moving to contracts
Kestrel Analytical tests food, water and environmental samples. It has 85 staff and revenue of €9.0 million, three-quarters of it from one-off jobs. Large laboratory groups compete on price, while mid-sized food producers want faster results and fewer suppliers. The management team chose to become the regular laboratory for those producers through monitoring contracts.
Objective and goals
Objective: within five years, be the laboratory that mid-sized food producers in our region trust with all their routine testing, because our results arrive fast and on time.
- G1 Revenue: from €9.0 million to €12.0 million in year five.
- G2 Contract revenue: from 25% to 55% of revenue in year five.
- G3 Operating margin: from 7% to 11% in year five.
- G4 On-time results: from 88% to 95% of results within the agreed turnaround, from year two, measured monthly.
Strategies, measures and actions
| Strategy | Measures | Actions (owner, timing) |
|---|---|---|
| S1 Sell multi-year monitoring packages to food producers | Contract revenue; contracts signed; renewal rate | Packages for dairy, meat and bakery (commercial director, Q1 of year one); hire two account managers (commercial director, year one) |
| S2 Digital intake and reporting through a client portal | Share of samples registered through the portal; admin hours per 1,000 samples | Portal live for the first 20 clients (IT lead, Q2 of year one); barcode kits for all contract clients (operations manager, year two) |
| S3 Build microbiology capacity for fast turnaround | Average turnaround for standard tests; analyser utilisation | Extended shift (laboratory director, Q3 of year one); second analyser (laboratory director, year two) |
| S4 Stop low-volume tests and one-off work below the margin floor | Margin per test family; number of test types offered | Drop or outsource 40 of 180 test types (quality manager, Q2 of year one); minimum order value for one-off clients (commercial director, year one) |
Arithmetic check: contract revenue rises from 25% x €9.0 million = €2.25 million to 55% x €12.0 million = €6.6 million. One-off revenue therefore falls from €6.75 million to €5.4 million, which fits strategy S4. Operating profit rises from 7% x €9.0 million = €630,000 to 11% x €12.0 million = €1.32 million.
Fictitious Firmfocus example. Amounts in euro; the logic works in any currency.
Every action traces back to a strategy and every strategy to a goal. The year-one actions return as initiatives in the implementation plan.
Cascading an OGSM to departments
Each department writes its own page, in which a company strategy becomes its objective. Go no more than two levels down.
| Part | Company OGSM | Microbiology department |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | The laboratory food producers trust with all their routine testing | Microbiology results producers can plan their production around |
| Goals | G1 to G4 | 95% on time from year two; standard tests in 2.5 working days on average by year three; re-tests caused by lab errors below 0.5% of samples |
| Strategies | S1 to S4 | Extended shift; train technicians on two test families; link analysers to the lab information system |
| Measures | Company dashboard | Daily turnaround report; training matrix; re-test log |
Fictitious Firmfocus example.
OGSM, OKR or Balanced Scorecard?
| Feature | OGSM | OKR | Balanced Scorecard |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core | From ambition to choices and actions on one page | An ambitious objective with a few measurable key results | Balanced objectives and measures in four perspectives |
| Horizon | Three to five years, updated yearly | Usually one quarter | Ongoing |
| Ambition | Achievable with effort | Deliberately beyond what seems feasible | A target value per measure |
| Strength | Coherence and focus | Team focus and speed | Shows how drivers lead to financial results |
OGSM pitfalls
- Goals in the strategies column: "grow contract revenue" is a goal; "sell monitoring packages to food producers" is a strategy.
- Too many strategies: more than five means no real choice has been made.
- Words without a choice: "customer-focused" or "excellence" rule nothing out.
- Only lagging measures: revenue and margin tell you too late. Add a measure that moves first, such as turnaround or contracts signed.
- Actions without an owner or budget: they stay intentions.
- A page nobody discusses: without a quarterly review, the OGSM becomes a poster.
OGSM in a small business and a larger organisation
Small business
One page for the whole firm, written by the owner with two or three key people, with three goals and three strategies. Track the measures in the monthly meeting and check the margin goal against your industry figures. The risk: the owner writes it alone and nobody else owns it.
Larger organisation
A company page plus one page per unit, with the company strategies returning as unit objectives. Test the draft with the people who will carry it out. The risk: a cascade so deep that nobody sees the link to the company goals.
OGSM is the goal-setting building block of execution and control. For quarterly team goals, see OKRs; to show how drivers lead to results, see the Balanced Scorecard. Every topic is in the strategy overview.
What does OGSM stand for?
Where does the OGSM model come from?
What is the difference between OGSM and OKR?
How often should you update an OGSM?
Sources
- Management Review: Doran, There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives (November 1981)
- American Psychologist: Locke and Latham, Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation (September 2002)
- Academy of Management Perspectives: Ordóñez, Schweitzer, Galinsky and Bazerman, Goals gone wild: the systematic side effects of overprescribing goal setting (February 2009)
- McKinsey Quarterly: Rumelt, The perils of bad strategy (June 2011)
Maak gebruik van onze ondernemerstools en de laatste branche-informatie
Verkrijg direct toegang tot alle stappen, downloads en tools voor ondernemers.
- Toegang tot de meest actuele bedrijfstakcijfers
- Ondernemingsplan online tool — schrijf en download naar MS Word
- Download tools en templates voor ondernemers
- Vergelijk en bewaar uw eigen cijfers met het branchegemiddelde